Cloud computing started gaining traction among companies ever since it was first introduced in the mid-2000s. Nowadays, it is an important business tool that opens the door for a lot of business opportunities via data analysis and storage. Since choosing a cloud provider is one of the most important business and technical decisions you can make, we would like to compare and contrast the big names that are out there: Azure vs Google Cloud.
When choosing a cloud provider, one of the first questions that people ask is how much do they charge for particular services. Since everybody’s needs will vary, let’s take a look at the cost of the smallest instance. The Google Cloud Platform is the clear winner here and is about 25% cheaper than competitor rates. They can offer you 2 virtual CPUs and 8 GB of RAM for about $52 a month. It also has the cheapest rates for the biggest instance with 3.75 TB of RAM and 160 vCPUs for $5.32 an hour.
Like we said earlier, the price will depend on your individual needs such as bandwidth, storage, types of instances, and many other factors. When you visit the website of each individual provider, they will have a pricing calculator that you can use to get an approximate cost of services you need.
Google may be the cheaper option but how does it compare with Azure as far as computing is concerned? Well, for starters, both offer virtual machine instances with Azure offering VMs and Google with the Compute Engine. Azure covers more regions and has more availability zones and it will be easier to autoscale with Azure.
If you are looking to implement Function as a Service (FaaS) which is serverless computing with serverless architecture, you will need to consider the languages that each platform supports. Google Functions support Node.js and Python 3.7. Azure Functions support C#, Python, Java, Node.js, PHP. The decision between Azure vs Google Cloud might come down to the expertise that you have on staff because it will be difficult to learn on the job.
Storing all of your data on the cloud servers is one thing, but accessing is a whole new ball game. This is why in addition to the size of the storage, you need to know who quickly you might need access to this data in the future and is the vendor capable of providing such speeds for you. While only you can answer the first part of the question, there is a way for you to see how quickly you can access the data. Vendors offer input/output operations per second rate (IOPS). Google offers a higher IOPS than any other provider with a 40,000 IOPS for reads and 30,000 for writes. Azure has only 5,000 IOPS. Google also offers its customers a wider selection of the size of the block storage volume. This will range between 1 GB and 64 TB for Google compared with 1 GB and 1 TB for Azure.
Azure vs Google Cloud: Making the Choice
Now that we took a look at some of the core service offerings, now it’s time to make a choice. However, If we take a look at why Azure is so successful even though they were a relatively late entrant into the cloud market. If your company uses some of its popular on-premise business software such as Sharepoint, Power BI, and many others, then using Azure will definitely be easier for you because Azure has close integration with such services. Also, if you are a current Microsoft customer, you can expect to get a discount on Azure as well.
Even those who are new to cloud computing will know that two companies, Azure and AWS, occupy most of the market share. Because of this, any company that wants to compete will have to provide some very specific services and be outstanding at it. When talking about the Google Cloud Platform, this is application container deployments. Part of the reason for this is because Google developed the standard for this service that is now used by its competitors. But the fact of the matter is that they do not provide the same myriad of services as the competitors do.
Also, the Google Cloud Platform offers a lot of complex computing useful for obtaining business insights via data analysis, AI projects and as an extra bonus, great load-balancing. All things considered, it would be best to use this service to supplement something that you already have. If you are more centered towards DevOps, the GCP will not be as useful as AWS since the latter has dedicated software release workflows and deployment automation.
To summarize, here are how the two platforms compare:
- Google Cloud is cheaper than Microsoft Azure and offers more storage capabilities.
- The choice between the two will also depend on other business software used by the company. For example, if you use Sharepoint, PowerBI, Dynamic 365, or other Microsoft apps, then Azure is a clear choice.
- Azure covers more regions and has more availability zones making it a lot easier to autoscale.
- Google Cloud has deeper expertise with open source technologies such as containers.
This comparison between Azure vs Google Cloud was meant to be used as a general guide for getting an overview of each service. If you would like to get more detailed information, it would be a good idea to hire an external provider who specializes in cloud computing and provide you with more detailed information on which one is right for you.
Dive deeper into the topic, exploring the essentials of what is Azure Cloud and how it can be used.